Chapter IV: Incarceration and Reentry
Policy Statement 20: Release Decision
Recommendation d: Ensure that the releasing authority can identify and obtain access to community-based programs and resources adequate to support the treatment and successful community reintegration of parolees with mental illness and that such programs and resources are available in the communities to which parolees return.
Lack of resources in the community is a major obstacle in addressing the special needs of this group of offenders. When asked, "What community resource is most lacking in regard to placing parolees back into the community?" state parole directors polled in the year 2000 identified the inadequacy of services for people with mental illness. The two resources they identified most frequently - housing and licensed substance abuse treatment - are key to successful community reintegration for parolees with mental illness. [1]
For instance, paroling authorities are put in a difficult position when prerelease program staff at the prison recommend specific conditions of release that are difficult to implement or enforce, given limited resources available. In these situations, the releasing authority may be understandably reluctant to approve the inmate's release. In some cases, the inmate's release is delayed due to the lack of an appropriate placement plan until they have completed their sentence, causing them to return to the community without any structured plan or supervision. Such delays serve neither the offender's treatment needs nor the interests of justice.
Before placing an individual in the community, parole board members need to be assured that the services required for the successful reintegration of the offender with mental illness are available in the communities to which they return. Most jurisdictions engage staff or consultants to the parole board to investigate and report to the board the existence and adequacy of local services. Boards need this assistance to help them know and understand the degree of mental illness, needed elements of a release plan to the community, and alternatives to revocation.
Example: Forensic Community Re-entry and Rehabilitation for Female Prison Inmates with Mental Illness, Mental Retardation, and Co-occurring Disorders, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Due to the lack of sufficient community-based mental health services and adequate housing, inmates with mental illness in Pennsylvania state prisons are significantly more likely than other inmates to serve their maximum sentence. In response to this problem, the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC) developed the Forensic Community Re-entry and Rehabilitation program, which is a collaborative effort between the DOC, the, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (PBPP), and the Pennsylvania Community Providers Association (PCPA). The program will employ a community placement specialist to develop, in conjunction with the parole board and community-based providers, comprehensive transition plans and conduct follow up for program participants. When necessary, the program will provide transitional housing for up to 60 days. Once the offender is paroled, the placement specialist will conduct follow up interviews with community-based providers to monitor the offender's progress.
The program will be launched in May 2002.
-
Information gathered from an informal survey of state parole directors taken at the winter 2000 meeting of the Association of Paroling Authorities International, as reported by Gail Hughes, director, private correspondence, 2001.
back

