To return to the Local Program Example Database, click here
JMHCP Grantee (2010) -- Cherokee County Mental Health Court
Quick Facts:
- Date accepted first participant:
- May/2006
- Mental health docket frequency:
- Monthly
- Number of participants per year:
- 0-50
- Clinical eligibility criteria:
- The court accepts participants with Axis I diagnoses if the diagnoses correspond to state criteria for “serious and / or persistent mental illness”
- Clinical exclusion criteria:
-
- Primary substance use disorders
- Developmental disabilities
- Traumatic brain injuries
- Legal eligibility criteria:
-
- Misdemeanors
- Misdemeanor probation violations
- Felonies (property)
- Felonies (nonviolent)
- Felony probation violations
- Case disposition upon successful program completion:
- Participants' charges may be dismissed upon successful completion
- Participants' charges may be reduced upon successful completion
- Participants' time under supervision may be reduced
- Participants' records may be expunged
- Case disposition upon unsuccessful program completion:
-
- Participants are returned to the court of original jurisdiction for case processing
- Participants are returned to the court of original jurisdiction for sentencing
- Court and service components funded by:
- State funds
JMHCP Grantee Information
- Grant Year
- 2010
JMHCP Grantee (2010) -- Cherokee County Mental Health Court
Contact:
- Name:
- Nisha Wilson
- Title:
- Criminal Justice Specialist
- Organization:
- Cherokee County Mental Health Court
- Address:
- 1200 NE 13th Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73117 - Email:
- NWilson@odmhsas.org
- Phone:
- 405-522-3856
JMHCP Grantee (2010) -- Cherokee County Mental Health Court
General: Jurisdiction, History, and Planning
- Grantee Year:
- Rural
- Other collaborative criminal justice/mental health initiatives in community:
-
Programs of Assertive Community Based Treatment (PACT)
- Date accepted first participant:
- May/2006
- Mental health docket frequency:
- Monthly
- Number of participants per year:
- 0-50
- Planning and oversight/advisory group:
- The court had a planning committee that ceased meeting after the court's creation
- Oversight group members:
-
- Community mental health service provider
- Consumer of mental health services
- Judicial officer (e.g. a judge or magistrate)
- Court administrator / program director
- Prosecutor
Eligibility Criteria
- Clinical eligibility criteria:
- The court accepts participants with Axis I diagnoses if the diagnoses correspond to state criteria for “serious and / or persistent mental illness”
- Clinical exclusion criteria:
-
- Primary substance use disorders
- Developmental disabilities
- Traumatic brain injuries
- Establishment of clinical eligibility criteria:
-
- They were established in consultation with mental health treatment providers
- They were established with an understanding of the jurisdiction's treatment capacity
- They were established according to the jurisdictions' needs
- Legal eligibility criteria:
-
- Misdemeanors
- Misdemeanor probation violations
- Felonies (property)
- Felonies (nonviolent)
- Felony probation violations
- Effect of criminal history on eligibility:
- Degree to which crime victims are involved in court processes:
- Victims are notified when individuals enter the court program
- Reasons for lack of victim involvement in court processes:
- The court's rules regarding participant confidentiality limit victims' rights to notification and participation in the court program
Court Team and Training
- Personnel who participate in case staffings:
- Judicial officer (e.g. judge or magistrate)
- Court administrator / program director
- Prosecutor
- Treatment provider or case manager employed by community mental health service provider
- Job orientation:
- Staff are oriented on-the-job
- Training topics:
-
- Overview of mental illness (e.g. recognizing symptoms or medications)
- Integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment
- The court process and legal considerations
- Local mental health services and community treatment capacity
- Trauma issues
Participant Information
- Primary sources of referrals:
- Mental health / substance abuse treatment providers
- Prosecutors
- Defense attorneys
- Mental health screening conducted by:
- Community mental health service provider
- Mental health assessment conducted by:
- Community mental health service provider
- Point at which full mental health assessment conducted:
- Before eligibility is determined
Terms and Duration of Participation
- Legal mechanism by which participants are accepted into court program:
-
- Participants' charges are held in abeyance and then dismissed upon successful program completion
- Participants plead guilty and have their sentence deferred
- Participants are sentenced to participation after committing a probation violation
- Participants opt into the court after committing a probation violation
- Varies depending on charge
- Case disposition upon successful program completion:
- Participants' charges may be dismissed upon successful completion
- Participants' charges may be reduced upon successful completion
- Participants' time under supervision may be reduced
- Participants' records may be expunged
- Case disposition upon unsuccessful program completion:
-
- Participants are returned to the court of original jurisdiction for case processing
- Participants are returned to the court of original jurisdiction for sentencing
- Terms of participation:
- They are standard with individualized terms routinely added
- The court uses a formal, standard written contract for all participants:
- Yes
- Minimum and maximum periods of participation:
- Min: 1 year, Max: maximum amount by statute that participant could have spent in jail.
- Average length of participation:
- 1 year to 2 years
Confidentiality and Informed Choice
- The court obtains written consent to release personal information:
- Yes, participants sign an initial release upon joining the program and subsequent releases when additional information is requested or shared
- Court-supervised treatment becomes part of the participants' criminal record:
- No
- The court has standard protocols for establishing legal competence of potential participants:
- Yes, the court program has a system for establishing legal competence aside from the state system
- Length of time to assess participants' legal competence
- Two weeks
- After assessment of legal competence, length of time before assessment of clincial competence:
- The court program does not make a distinction between legal and clinical competence
- Defense counsel helps potential participants decide whether to enter the court:
- Yes
Monitoring, Supervision, Treatment, and Adherence
- Monitoring and supervision of participants primarily performed by:
- Court team members mental health background
- Services available to court participants:
- Emergency psychiatric services (crisis stabilization)
- Assistance in locating housing
- Assistance in accessing benefits (e.g. Medicaid, SSI, SSDI, veterans)
- Civil (legal) services assistance
- Inpatient mental health treatment
- Outpatient mental health treatment
- Substance abuse treatment (independent from mental health treatment)
- Integrated substance abuse and mental health treatment
- Medication management
- Individual psychotherapy
- Group psychotherapy
- Family therapy
- Court-supported services available after program completion:
- Yes
- Rewards and incentives applied to participants who adhere to terms of treatment plans:
- Certificates or other tokens for completing stages of treatment
- Graduation ceremonies
- Praise from the judge
- Extended privileges (e.g. where people are allowed to live, whom them may visit, furloughs and leaves of absence)
- Sanctions applied to participants who do not adhere to terms of treatment plans:
- Jail
- Expulsion from the program
- Modifications in treatment plan (e.g. more frequent appointments with a case manager, adjustment to medications, increased drug screening, etc.)
- Judicial reprimands
- Increased supervision intensity (e.g. meetings with a probation officer or case manager, drug testing, visits to court on a normal docket day)
- Home visits
- Community service
Sustainability
- Court and service components funded by:
- State funds
- Has the court received media coverage?
- Yes
- Is there published research on the court program?
- No
About this information:
A program representative provided this information details through a detailed survey.
For more information on the survey, read about our methodology or download a pdf of the full survey.
If you are a representative of a similar program not yet listed in our database, please register and take the survey to contribute your information.

