To return to the Local Program Example Database, click here
Bonneville County Mental Health Court
Quick Facts:
- Date accepted first participant:
- 08/01/02
- Mental health docket frequency:
- Weekly
- Number of participants per year:
- 0-50
- Clinical eligibility criteria:
- The court accepts participants with Axis I diagnoses if the diagnoses correspond to state criteria for “serious and / or persistent mental illness”
- Clinical exclusion criteria:
-
- Primary substance use disorders
- Traumatic brain injuries
- Legal eligibility criteria:
- Ordinance offenses / violations
- Misdemeanors
- Misdemeanor probation violations
- Felonies (property)
- Felonies (nonviolent)
- Felonies (violent)
- Felony probation violations
- Case disposition upon successful program completion:
-
- Participants' charges may be reduced upon successful completion
- Participants' time under supervision may be reduced
- Case disposition upon unsuccessful program completion:
-
- Participants are returned to the court of original jurisdiction for case processing
- Participants are returned to the court of original jurisdiction for sentencing
- Court and service components funded by:
- Federal funds
- State funds
- State mental health funds
- Regional mental health funds
- Court fees
Bonneville County Mental Health Court
Contact:
- Name:
- Eric Olson
- Title:
- Court Coordinator
- Organization:
- Bonneville County, Idaho
- Address:
- 545 Shoup Suite 105B
Idaho Falls, ID 83402 - Email:
- ericolson@qwestoffice.net
- Phone:
- 208-360-0262
Bonneville County Mental Health Court
General: Jurisdiction, History, and Planning
- Grantee Year:
- Rural
- Other collaborative criminal justice/mental health initiatives in community:
- Working on CIT Teams
Drug Courts
Diversion MH court also - Date accepted first participant:
- 08/01/02
- Mental health docket frequency:
- Weekly
- Number of participants per year:
- 0-50
- Planning and oversight/advisory group:
- The court had a planning committee that has evolved into an oversight/advisory capacity
- Oversight group members:
- Community mental health service provider
- State mental health agency representative
- State mental health agency head
- Substance abuse treatment provider
- Housing provider
- Consumer of mental health services
- Consumers' advocate
- Pretrial services staff
- Judicial officer (e.g. a judge or magistrate)
- Court administrator / program director
- Prosecutor
- Public defender
- Corrections officer
- Corrections department head
Eligibility Criteria
- Clinical eligibility criteria:
- The court accepts participants with Axis I diagnoses if the diagnoses correspond to state criteria for “serious and / or persistent mental illness”
- Clinical exclusion criteria:
-
- Primary substance use disorders
- Traumatic brain injuries
- Establishment of clinical eligibility criteria:
-
- They were established in consultation with mental health treatment providers
- They were established with an understanding of the jurisdiction's treatment capacity
- They were established according to the jurisdictions' needs
- Legal eligibility criteria:
- Ordinance offenses / violations
- Misdemeanors
- Misdemeanor probation violations
- Felonies (property)
- Felonies (nonviolent)
- Felonies (violent)
- Felony probation violations
- Effect of criminal history on eligibility:
- Degree to which crime victims are involved in court processes:
- Prosecuting attorney works with victims for approval of an offender into the program.
- Reasons for lack of victim involvement in court processes:
Court Team and Training
- Personnel who participate in case staffings:
- Judicial officer (e.g. judge or magistrate)
- Prosecutor
- Treatment provider or case manager employed by community mental health service provider
- Community supervision officer (probation or parole)
- Job orientation:
- Staff are oriented on-the-job
- Ongoing training:
- Yes, there are annual training requirements.
- Training topics:
- Overview of mental illness (e.g. recognizing symptoms or medications)
- Integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment
- The court process and legal considerations
- Graduated sanctions and the role of coercion
- Information sharing with community mental health service providers
- Local mental health services and community treatment capacity
- Treatment engagement
- Trauma issues
- Substance abuse treatment
Participant Information
- Primary sources of referrals:
- Probation officers
- Defense attorneys
- Mental health screening conducted by:
-
- Community mental health service provider
- Court personnel with mental health background / experience
- Court personnel with a criminal justice background / experience
- Probation officer
- Mental health assessment conducted by:
- Community mental health service provider
- Point at which full mental health assessment conducted:
- After a participant has been accepted into court
Terms and Duration of Participation
- Legal mechanism by which participants are accepted into court program:
- Case disposition upon successful program completion:
-
- Participants' charges may be reduced upon successful completion
- Participants' time under supervision may be reduced
- Case disposition upon unsuccessful program completion:
-
- Participants are returned to the court of original jurisdiction for case processing
- Participants are returned to the court of original jurisdiction for sentencing
- Terms of participation:
- They are individualized based on the offense and the clinical diagnosis
- The court uses a formal, standard written contract for all participants:
- Yes
- Minimum and maximum periods of participation:
- Minimum is 14 months.
- Average length of participation:
- 1 year to 2 years
Confidentiality and Informed Choice
- The court obtains written consent to release personal information:
- Yes, participants sign an initial release upon joining the program and subsequent releases when additional information is requested or shared
- Court-supervised treatment becomes part of the participants' criminal record:
- Yes
- The court has standard protocols for establishing legal competence of potential participants:
- No, the state determines legal competence before an individual is referred to the court program
- Length of time to assess participants' legal competence
- 72 hours
- After assessment of legal competence, length of time before assessment of clincial competence:
- One week
- Defense counsel helps potential participants decide whether to enter the court:
- Yes
Monitoring, Supervision, Treatment, and Adherence
- Monitoring and supervision of participants primarily performed by:
- Court team members mental health background
- Services available to court participants:
- Emergency psychiatric services (crisis stabilization)
- Assistance in locating housing
- Assistance in financing housing
- Assistance in accessing benefits (e.g. Medicaid, SSI, SSDI, veterans)
- Transportation (e.g. bus fare, rides to program-related appointments)
- Child care
- Supported employment
- Court sponsored 'alumni' groups
- Civil (legal) services assistance
- Inpatient mental health treatment
- Outpatient mental health treatment
- Integrated substance abuse and mental health treatment
- Medication management
- Individual psychotherapy
- Group psychotherapy
- Family therapy
- Court-supported services available after program completion:
- Yes
- Rewards and incentives applied to participants who adhere to terms of treatment plans:
- Certificates or other tokens for completing stages of treatment
- Graduation ceremonies
- Early completion of participation in court program
- The court does not have a standardized list of rewards / incentives
- Praise from the judge
- Increased time between status hearings
- Food items or gift certificates from local businesses
- Reduced/waived fees for probation supervision or drug testing
- Wrap around services such as help with clothing, home repairs, purchasing materials for school and employment, etc.
- Extended privileges (e.g. where people are allowed to live, whom them may visit, furloughs and leaves of absence)
- Sanctions applied to participants who do not adhere to terms of treatment plans:
- Restriction of finances (e.g. appointment of a representative payee)
- Fines / fees
- Jail
- Expulsion from the program
- Modifications in treatment plan (e.g. more frequent appointments with a case manager, adjustment to medications, increased drug screening, etc.)
- The court does not have a standardized list of sanctions.
- Judicial reprimands
- Journal assignments
- Increased frequency of status hearings
- Increased supervision intensity (e.g. meetings with a probation officer or case manager, drug testing, visits to court on a normal docket day)
- Restriction of privileges (e.g. curfew, travel)
- Community service
Sustainability
- Court and service components funded by:
- Federal funds
- State funds
- State mental health funds
- Regional mental health funds
- Court fees
- Has the court received media coverage?
- Yes
- Is there published research on the court program?
- Heathcote Wales from Georgetown University has a publication in process.
About this information:
A program representative provided this information details through a detailed survey.
For more information on the survey, read about our methodology or download a pdf of the full survey.
If you are a representative of a similar program not yet listed in our database, please register and take the survey to contribute your information.

